Who may hold a licence
Registered companies only, with no drug-related conviction in the preceding ten years.
What it means: Individual farmers and households cannot be licensees in their own right. Participation routes through a company structure.
Industry Tracker
Last reviewed
There is no official public record of how far Nepal's cannabis framework has progressed, so we maintain one. It covers the whole sector, not our own position in it — including the parts that are inconvenient for us.
Recreational cannabis is illegal in Nepal. Industrial hemp is not yet lawful at federal level, and Gandaki Province enacted a cannabis act on 3 August 2026 over its Province Chief's written objection — leaving the relationship between the two unresolved. Himalaya Cannabis holds an industrial hemp cultivation licence; we cannot speak to how many others do. No accredited cannabis testing laboratory yet operates inside the country.
The route it took matters, because it is the reason the act's standing is contested rather than settled.
1976
Cannabis prohibited federally, ending the era of government-licensed hashish shops in Kathmandu. The Act draws no line between industrial hemp and drug-type cannabis and sets no THC threshold — the ambiguity every subsequent effort has had to work around.
Nov 2025
A medical and industrial cannabis bill is tabled in the Gandaki Provincial Assembly.
9–10 Jul 2026
The Provincial Assembly passes the bill without a dissenting vote.
24 Jul 2026
Assent is withheld under Article 201(3), on the stated ground that the act conflicts with the federal Narcotic Drugs (Control) Act. The objection is public and reasoned — which makes it a roadmap for any future legal challenge.
31 Jul 2026
The Assembly passes the act a second time without amendment, triggering the constitutional override route.
3 Aug 2026
The act is authenticated under Article 201(4) and takes effect in Gandaki Province, with a 0.3% THC ceiling for industrial cultivation and mandatory pre-harvest certified laboratory testing.
Pending
Cultivation is permitted only in districts designated by provincial gazette notice. No designation is known to have been published. Until one is, no application can proceed — including in Lamjung.
Pending
The regulations that will govern application, inspection, and enforcement have not been published. Their terms will determine whether the framework is commercially workable.
“Unless the federal law is amended or revised, it is not possible to legalize cannabis cultivation at the provincial level.”
These provisions come from press reporting of the Gandaki act. The gazetted text and draft regulations have not been published, so treat every line below as indicative until they are.
Registered companies only, with no drug-related conviction in the preceding ten years.
What it means: Individual farmers and households cannot be licensees in their own right. Participation routes through a company structure.
Perimeter wall or fencing and CCTV, built and passing inspection before a licence is granted.
What it means: Capital must be spent before any licence exists. Because perimeter cost scales with the number of boundaries rather than total area, many small dispersed plots are dramatically more expensive to secure than a few consolidated blocks.
Below 0.3% THC for industrial cultivation.
What it means: Certified seed provenance becomes essential — a crop that tests above the line is not a compliant crop.
Mandatory testing at certified laboratories before harvest, processing, or sale.
What it means: No accredited cannabis laboratory currently exists in Nepal. This is the binding constraint on the entire regime, not a paperwork step.
Districts designated by provincial gazette notice.
What it means: No district is known to be designated yet. This is the first gate, and it is currently closed for everyone.
Five years.
What it means: Renewal risk sits inside any business plan longer than five years, and a compliance record is the renewal argument.
Administrative fines reported in the range of NPR 50,000–500,000; criminal violations fall under federal narcotics law.
What it means: A provincial licence is not a shield against federal criminal liability. This is the single most important sentence on this page for anyone considering entering the sector.
The questions below do not have confident answers yet. Anyone giving you one should be asked what they are relying on.
Provisions of the Gandaki act described here come from press reporting. We have not obtained the gazetted text or the draft regulations, and we say so rather than implying a certainty we don't have. Trade figures are from UN COMTRADE (HS 5302). Federal law references are to the Narcotic Drugs (Control) Act, 2033 (1976).
This page is general information, not legal advice. Nobody should commit capital, plant a crop, or sign an agreement on the strength of a website — including this one. Obtain written advice from Nepali counsel.
Found something wrong? Tell us and we will correct it. A tracker that is wrong is worse than no tracker at all, so corrections are genuinely welcome — info@himalayacannabis.com.
Journalists, researchers, and organisations are free to cite this page. Attribution to Himalaya Cannabis Pvt. Ltd. with a link is appreciated.